Abstract
The ATM SESAR projects have invested a significant effort to define, besides tabular representations, graphical modeling notations to capture ATM architectural elements. A key question is whether this is worth the effort for security risk assessment. It is important to understand which representation provides better comprehension of threats, vulnerabilities, security
countermeasures, as well as the relationships between them.
In this paper we present a preliminary study on the comprehensibility of two risk modeling notations, involving students from Trento and Oslo universities. In particular, we assessed the effect of using graphical or tabular modeling notation on the actual comprehension of security risk models. The subjects
were asked to answer eight comprehension questions about the risk assessment concepts (like threats, vulnerabilities or controls) represented using graphical or tabular notation. The results of the data analysis show no significant difference in actual
comprehension. Further studies are required to strengthen the statistical significance and to investigate the extent to which the findings are relevant for more general contexts.
countermeasures, as well as the relationships between them.
In this paper we present a preliminary study on the comprehensibility of two risk modeling notations, involving students from Trento and Oslo universities. In particular, we assessed the effect of using graphical or tabular modeling notation on the actual comprehension of security risk models. The subjects
were asked to answer eight comprehension questions about the risk assessment concepts (like threats, vulnerabilities or controls) represented using graphical or tabular notation. The results of the data analysis show no significant difference in actual
comprehension. Further studies are required to strengthen the statistical significance and to investigate the extent to which the findings are relevant for more general contexts.
