Abstract
The normative concept of creativity involves imagination, originality, and intentionality, and while it is not always used for good, it is typically considered as a virtue (Gaut & Kieran, 2018). This is especially true in the profession of architecture, where creativity is central to the work toward “good architecture”. Architects face numerous challenges to their creative process, including budget limitations, compressed design schedules, and regulatory standards. Another factor that has caused some concern as a potential threat to creativity—is empirical research. While research is not currently a requisite component of the design process, there is a growing demand for it from clients and society in general. Little is understood about how research is perceived and influences the creative process in architecture. Is research another termite in the foundation of creativity, or can it fortify the structure?
This question is explored through the lens of multiple theories, supported by a thematic literature review and preliminary findings from a qualitative interview-based study on perceptions of research within the profession of architecture. Preliminary results are based on five out of ten interviews with architects and four out of ten interviews with educators.
The results show that— despite concerns around research in design—there are three ways in which research can benefit the creative process:
1. Research as a buttress: Fortification of creative integrity and virtue
2. Research as a buffer: Shelter and mitigation against other threats to creativity
3. Research as a baluster/bolster: Elevating creative quality and potential for innovation
This question is explored through the lens of multiple theories, supported by a thematic literature review and preliminary findings from a qualitative interview-based study on perceptions of research within the profession of architecture. Preliminary results are based on five out of ten interviews with architects and four out of ten interviews with educators.
The results show that— despite concerns around research in design—there are three ways in which research can benefit the creative process:
1. Research as a buttress: Fortification of creative integrity and virtue
2. Research as a buffer: Shelter and mitigation against other threats to creativity
3. Research as a baluster/bolster: Elevating creative quality and potential for innovation
